GRC & Management-System Automation
Your ISMS, QMS, or AIMS as a working system, not a spreadsheet — gap analysis, Statement of Applicability, control evidence, and audit readiness automated.
Key Features
- ✓ISMS, QMS, and AIMS implementation — ISO 27001, 9001, 42001, SOC 2
- ✓Gap analysis, risk assessment, and remediation-roadmap tooling
- ✓Statement of Applicability as a living register, not a document
- ✓Control evidence tracking and audit-readiness workflows
- ✓DORA register of information and ICT third-party contract tracking
- ✓Integrated management systems — shared policies, audits, and reviews
One system, several standards
ISO 9001, 27001, and 42001 share the same management-system skeleton, yet most organizations run them as parallel spreadsheets — separate policies, separate audits, separate evidence folders. We implement integrated management systems that share the common machinery (document control, internal audit, management review, corrective action) and layer the discipline-specific parts on top.
The Statement of Applicability becomes a living register — controls, owners, justifications, implementation status, evidence — instead of the file you scramble to update before an audit.
Compliance that produces evidence
Regulators and certification bodies want artifacts, not intentions: risk assessments with methodology, control selections with justification, incident registers, contract inventories. For financial entities that now includes DORA’s register of information over every ICT third-party contract — a system obligation, not a policy one. We build the tooling and the process so the evidence is a byproduct of operating, not a pre-audit project.
The approach is proven in public: our free readiness checkers score ISO 27001, 9001, 42001, and SOC 2 posture, the gap-analysis templates and Annex A control lists are already in use, and our DORA practice handles the financial-sector layer.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you implement the management system or just advise?
Both — depending on your internal capacity. Typical engagements run from a gap analysis through remediation support, tooling setup (SoA register, evidence workflows, registers), and pre-audit preparation. The goal is always a system you can operate without us.
Can one system really cover ISO 9001, 27001, and 42001?
Yes — they share the Annex SL structure, so 60–70% of the clauses map to common processes. The discipline-specific parts (risk assessment methods, control annexes, AI-specific impact assessment) layer on top. One audit cycle, one document-control system, one management review.
Further Reading
Related Products & Services
Interested?
Tell us about your project — we tailor every engagement to specific business objectives.